01 January, 2010

Three Idiots in One






Aamir, the all-knowing Bollywood hero has done it again. (see previous)

At first, he got some cheap publicity by traveling all over the country in different attires to attract attention. The film 3 Idiots for sure, has done exceedingly well and Aamir may be giving a pat on his own back thinking that it was his gimmick that resulted in the Box Office success.

By all accounts, it is a movie well made and all those involved should get due credit. It is another thing that true to typical Bollywood style, the producer, director and actor have ignored to give due credit to Chetan Bhagat, whose book Five Point Someone provided the base for the movie.

Understandably, the author of the book is aggrieved that his name appears at the end of the title credits almost as an “also ran”. Now that the movie has done well even beyond the wildest expectations of the makers, they are upset that Bhagat is making noises in public.

Both Rajkumar Hirani and Vidhu Vinod Chopra took great pains to tell the world that the story is written by someone else working for them. They also got flustered and angry amidst persistent questions raised by the media.



Unfortunately, the truth cannot be hidden by angry shouts and assertions. As early as February 2008, a Bollywood blog had reported that the Hirani was going to make a movie adaptation of the book with Aamir in lead. See here. Even when the movie was released, many reviewers clearly mentioned that the entire movie was largely based on the book. See for example here:

And yet, the movie makers insist that the movie is developed by their own genius. Aamir, the other genius who has acted in the movie, suggested during the media meet that Chagat was raising objections to gain publicity. Well, the idiot should know that whatever he (Aamir) did was all for cheap publicity, only for having acted as one of the three idiots in the movie. So, the person based on whose book the movie is made has every right to speak out which is far from saying that he is doing it for publicity now that the movie is such a success.

It is difficult to tell Aamir, the irrepressible, to shut up and keep playing his movie roles which he is good at. Self-styled geniuses are like that.

And as for plagiarism, Bollywood is known for it for so long. Making clones and copies is an obsession with Bollywood –it is truly the Ulhasnagar in movie world.

Even reputed movie makers like Mahesh Bhatt (another self styled genius) are not known to be averse to plagiarism. The song Ya Ali from his movie Gangster was a straight copy from an Arabic song by Guitara which he must have known. Listen



There are many sequences in his other movies which were straight copies of Hollywood movies which has already bee reported widely. Even Aamir starrer Rang De Basanti is said to have been based on All my Sons and Jesus of Montreal.


Bolly - the clone masters

So Bollywood has always been shameless and brazen when it comes to copying whether movie themes or music. It is not going to make any difference to them if people like Bhagat keep believing in Gandhi and Truth. The irony of it all is that this controversy is actually further helping the movie even if it will help Bhagat sell some more copies of his book to people curious enough to make a comparison between the movie and the book.

5 comments:

  1. It is amazing how everyone wants a share of the pie when it is a proven success.....All this BULSHIT C. Bhagat's raving and ranting appears so childish and totally not acceptable frm a writer like him. Once he has SOLD the rights of the book, to be used by the film maker he has no business to be crying like a brat who after giving away the candy realises that it was good afterall and shd not have been given! Oh grow up Chetan, we expect a more mature and a better sportsman like behavior frm u....

    ReplyDelete
  2. kamini chandhokJanuary 02, 2010

    what shergil says makes some sense except for the fact that the movie makers kept denying that it is based on his book even as they gave credit to him in small print in the titles at the end.
    it is hypocrisy on the one hand and trying to see that the author does not demand a bigger share of the pie on the other. even the film makers are guilty of the same mentality as the film has turned out to be a success.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Whatever said and done, now we all know that he deserves credit so a mere mention in the movie won't change things. That he spoke about it though makes complete sense.

    ReplyDelete
  4. but clearly someone who has read d book will know the story IS loosely based on the book..admitted it has been treated a lot differently..(and i felt better) but the basic idea and storyline is an adaptation from the book..!! why they have to lie about it is incomprehensible !!

    ReplyDelete
  5. they are playing it both ways. they give him small credit at the end of the title and yet want to show that its their own idea.

    they are selfish hypocrites. let bhagat learn a lesson.

    ReplyDelete

Comments on the content are welcome..